Statement from the trustees for the Beaverbrook (UK) Foundation:
Further to our original statement, following the ruling of the appellate panel, the trustees have been advised, by their legal counsel in Canada, that there is a point of law within the judgement that justifies further consideration.
05/10/2009 |
Read full article
Statement from the legal counsel for the Beaverbrook (U K) Foundation
The Beaverbrook Foundation is obviously disappointed with the ruling of the appellate panel, but is relieved the process is over.
While we stand by the arguments presented during the proceedings with respect to ownership of the works in dispute, we will respect and abide by the panel’s ruling.
This has not been a fruitless battle. It was an important case for the Foundation to bring and it welcomes the return of a third of the disputed pictures (48) to the ownership of the Foundation.
09/09/2009 |
Read full article
Reply Factum of the Appellants, The Trustees of The Beaverbrook Foundation
Reply Factum of the Appellants, The Trustees of The Beaverbrook Foundation
08/08/2008 |
Read full article
Factum of the Appellant of the Beaverbrook Foundation
This is an appeal by the Trustees of the Beaverbrook Foundation (the "Foundation") from the decision of Arbitrator Cory dated March 20, 2007 concerning the ownership of a collection of art.
05/03/2008 |
Read full article
The Foundation's Letter to L. Lowenstein With Letter of Appeal Certificate
The Foundation's Notice of Appel and Appellant's Certificate.
19/04/2007 |
Read full article
The Foundation's Opening Argument at the Arbitration Hearing in New Brunswick
This case concerns an effort by the Beaverbrook Art Gallery to re-write history.
23/07/2004 |
Read full article
The Foundation's Closing Argument at the Arbitration Hearing in New Brunswick
For more than 45 years, the Gallery has repeatedly and systematically acknowledged that the U.K. Beaverbrook Foundation owns the Works in Issue.
23/07/2004 |
Read full article
